Mock examEnglish Together · C1 Advanced · Exam Track

Mock 2 — Writing

Two tasks, ninety minutes, 220–260 words each. Write the answer first, then mark it against the real criteria and read the model. If a criterion will not tick, open the support, take the plan and write the same task again — the second version is where the marks are.

90 minutes2 parts220–260 words each20% of the examSupport on both parts
Writing · Mock 2 Supported 0 of 0 parts done
Part 1 · Compulsory

The essay

You must answer this question. Write your answer in 220–260 words in an appropriate style. Roughly 45 minutes.

Your notes

Your class has listened to a radio discussion about how a city can strengthen its cultural life. You have made the notes below.

Ways a city can strengthen its cultural life:
· public libraries
· small live music venues
· free entry to museums

Some opinions expressed in the discussion:
“A library is the only cultural building you can walk into without spending anything or being asked why you came.”
“Small venues are where musicians learn their trade. Take them away and you are left with stadiums and nothing underneath.”
“Free museums are wonderful, but the people who use them were mostly coming anyway.”

Write an essay discussing two of the ways in which a city can strengthen its cultural life. You should explain which of the two you think is more effective, giving reasons in support of your answer. You may, if you wish, make use of the opinions expressed in the discussion, but you should use your own words as far as possible.

Your answer 0 words

Mark your own against the real criteria:

  • Content. I have discussed exactly two of the three ways — not one, not all three — and I have said clearly which of the two is more effective.
  • Content. Every paragraph answers the question that was set. Nothing has been added that the task did not ask for, however interesting it is.
  • Communicative achievement. The register is a consistent, fairly formal essay voice: no contractions, no “you”, no exclamation marks, no rhetorical questions used as filler.
  • Communicative achievement. The opinions from the notes are in my own words. Nothing is copied from them for more than three or four words at a time.
  • Organisation. Introduction that frames the question · one paragraph for each of the two ways · a conclusion that gives the verdict. The verdict in the conclusion is the same one the introduction pointed towards.
  • Organisation. The joins between paragraphs are explicit and varied — concession, contrast, consequence — and no linking expression is used twice.
  • Language. At least three structures a B2 candidate would not reach for: a cleft (What matters is…), an inversion, a nominalisation, a concessive clause (While it is true that…), a passive report (is often said to…).
Part 2 · Choose one

The choice — proposal, review or letter

Write an answer to one of the questions 2–4 below. Write your answer in 220–260 words in an appropriate style. Put the question number at the top of your answer. Roughly 45 minutes.

Questions 2, 3 and 4

2 · Proposal. Your college has been given £5,000 to improve the experience of students who have recently arrived in the country. The principal has asked for proposals. Write a proposal in which you identify the main difficulty such students face, put forward two ways of spending the money, and explain what each of them would achieve.

3 · Review. An English-language student website is running a series called Overrated or Underrated. Write a review of a museum, gallery or historic building you have visited, explaining what visitors are led to expect, what they actually find, and who you would — and would not — recommend it to.

4 · Letter. A newspaper has published an article arguing that learning a foreign language is now a waste of a young person's time, since translation software will shortly do the work for them. Write a letter to the editor responding to the article.

Choose one of questions 2, 3 or 4 above. Begin your answer by typing the number you have chosen. Each is a different genre with a different reader and a different job to do — a proposal argues forward to somebody who must decide, a review evaluates for somebody deciding whether to go, a letter to an editor answers an argument in public.

Your answer 0 words

Mark your own against the real criteria:

  • Content. I have answered every element of the question I chose. For 2: the difficulty, two ways of spending, and what each achieves. For 3: expectation, reality, and a recommendation that says who it is not for. For 4: the article's argument named, and answered.
  • Communicative achievement. The genre is unmistakable from the first two lines. A reader shown only the opening could say which of the three I chose.
  • Communicative achievement. The register fits the reader: institutional and impersonal for the principal; personal and evaluative for the website; formal, civil and pointed for the editor. It does not drift halfway through.
  • Organisation. The shape belongs to the genre — headings and a recommendation section in a proposal; no headings in a letter; a review that does not tell the whole story in order.
  • Organisation. Paragraphs are of deliberate length and each one has a job. The last paragraph does something other than repeat the first.
  • Language. Genre-specific language is present and correct: I would recommend that…, It would be advisable to…, this would enable… in a proposal; evaluative adjectives and hedged concession in a review; I was surprised to read…, the article assumes… in a letter.
  • Language. 220–260 words, with errors that never obscure meaning, and at least three complex structures used because the sentence needed them.

What this paper told you

A writing part counts as done when the length is right and every criterion ticks. That is a harder test than the examiner's, on purpose.

0parts done
—marks, best unaided attempt
0parts where you opened the support

The subscale that moves fastest at C1 is communicative achievement — genre and register — and it moves by rewriting one task three times, not by writing three tasks once. Pick the part that would not tick and do it again on Sunday.